Five Best Android Phones
There are dozens—probably hundreds—of Android phones on the market today. Some of them are exclusive to specific carriers, some of them are available around the world, but only a few of them are at the head of their class. This week we wanted to know which Android phones you thought were the best available, not just because they round out a checklist of features or high-end hardware, but because you think they offer a great overall experience. Here's a look at the top five Android phones, based on your nominations.
Earlier in the week, we asked you which Android phones you thought were the best. There are plenty of sites willing to tell you which phones are the best based on the chips inside, the camera, the storage, or the version of Android pre-installed, but those things don't always add up to a great user experience. We asked you which phones—past or present—you thought were the best, and over 300 nominations later, we're back to highlight the top five.
Samsung Galaxy Note
Often referred to as a "phablet" because of its included stylus and massive 5.3" Super AMOLED display, the Samsung Galaxy Note (AT&T, $299 w/contract) is huge, but many of you praised it for blending the portability of a phone with some desperately needed tablet-like real estate. The 8MP and 2MP rear and front-side cameras and 1.4GHz dual core processor don't hurt matters either, and while it's definitely not the right size for everyone, those of you who have one love it, and others are looking forward to its release on other carriers. Plus, even though the Galaxy Note ships with Android 2.3 Gingerbread pre-installed, there are plenty of ROMs available to bring it up to Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich, or just replace Samsung's TouchWiz interface entirely.
HTC One X/S
The HTC One series is HTC's most recent attempt to recreate itself, not that the company really needed to—most people who have used HTC devices love them, and the HTC One X and One S are no exceptions to the rule. The One X (AT&T, $199 w/contract) is HTC's new flagship phone, sporting a 4.7" screen, a quad-core NVidia Tegra 3 (internationally) or a dual-core Qualcomm Snapdragon (US/Canada) processor, Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich (with HTC's Sense UI on top), built-in Beats Audio, and an 8MP rear camera with a 1.3MP front-facing camera. The HTC One S (T-Mobile, $189 w/contract) on the other hand is a slightly smaller 4.3" screen, a 1.5Ghz dual core processor, 8MP rear and VGA front cameras, Beats audio, and Ice Cream Sandwich. Both devices are slim, powerhouse devices designed to bring Android lovers' focus back to a select group of high-end HTC devices, instead of the dozen-plus ones HTC has released in the past. So far, it's working.
Samsung Galaxy S/S II
The Samsung Galaxy S series of devices are some of the most popular smartphones in the world, and even though Samsung and Apple are embroiled in a patent lawsuit over exactly how similar the Galaxy S is to the iPhone (and vice versa), that hasn't stopped the Galaxy S and the Galaxy S II from selling millions of units worldwide. The Galaxy S was one of the first dual-core Android smartphones, and definitely one of the first to feature Samsung's new (at the time) Super AMOLED display, offering bright and crisp colors even in bright light. It's still available for a song depending on the carrier you pick it up from (in the US, it was sold under the name Vibrant (T-Mobile), Captivate (AT&T), Fascinate (Verizon Wireless), and Epic (Sprint) in both 3G and 4G variants.) History aside, the Samsung Galaxy S II is the company's current model and features a 4.3" Super AMOLED display, a 1.2GHz dual core processor, and while it shipped with Android 2.3, most carriers have been slowly rolling out updates to bring the device up to Android 4.0. Pricing varies depending on the carrier and variant you pick up, but one thing is certain: when it was launched, most people considered the Galaxy S II the best Android smartphone—if not the best smartphone—available on the market, which makes the furor over the upcoming Samsung Galaxy S III that much louder.
Droid Series by Motorola
The Droid by Motorola (Motorola Milestone, internationally) series was one of the earliest Android phones on the market to really bring Android to the masses—and definitely the first Android phone available on Verizon Wireless at the time. It was a tough call to group the Droid series together, but it's worth noting that those of you who nominated the Droid line in large numbers specifically mentioned the slider models, not the candybar models like the Droid Razr, Razr Maxx, or the Bionic (although they all got strong nominations as well)-all available on Verizon Wireless in the US. The Motorola Droid 4 (VZW, $199 w/contract) is the current iteration of the phone, featuring a 4" qHD display, a 1.2GHz dual core processor, 8MP rear and 1.3MP front-facing cameras, and most notably, a slide-out backlit keyboard that allows the phone to be used in both portrait and landscape modes without sacrificing screen real estate. The Droid line is still one of the few high-end Android devices to feature a physical keyboard, making it popular for both portability, and with people who prefer physical keyboards to on-screen ones. The Droid 4 sports Android Gingerbread, and rides Verizon Wireless' 4G network.
Samsung Galaxy Nexus
The Samsung Galaxy Nexus (VZW, Sprint, $199/w contract, $399 unlocked) is the current official "Google Phone," having launched with Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich and currently serves as the flagship Android device. It sports a 4.6" Super AMOLED display, a curved contour screen, a 1.2GHz dual core processor, and 5MP and 1.3MP rear and front-facing cameras. It's a pure Google experience, meaning the phone is (largely) free of bloatware and other apps pre-installed by carriers and manufacturers, and is notably missing Samsung's TouchWiz UI layer in favor of a clean version of Ice Cream Sandwich. The phone also sports Google's NFC payment system, Google Wallet. The camera boasts zero shutter lag, and it was the first phone to launch with Ice Cream Sandwich pre-installed, and it's still one of the few devices you can get that already has it. If you want the more true and pure Android experience possible, or want an Android phone that's officially supported by Google, this is it.
www.chargezone.co.uk
www.youtube.com/chargezone
www.vimeo.com/chargezone
http://chargezone.tumblr.com
The Public Smartphone Charging Media with Brand Focused Advertising
Follow @chargezone
Chargezone is a public smartphone charging Media Company with brand focused advertising which is based in Royal Berkshire United Kingdom. Chargezone is the exclusive distributor of Automated Charging Machines, public charging stations that rapidly charge a variety of devices. At Chargezone, our mission as a public smart mobile phone charging media company is to empower smartphone users while on the go by keeping them recharged, always connected and you never miss a moment
Sunday, 29 April 2012
Thursday, 26 April 2012
Poorly coded websites are causing smartphone batteries to drain more than necessary, research has suggested.
A team at Stanford University compared the energy consumption of leading websites including Wikipedia and the Internet Movie Database.
Tests were run using an Android smartphone, with Google Mail declared as the "greenest" mobile site tested.
Last month, research showed that free mobile apps were also overly draining battery power.
Power drain
The findings blamed built-in systems for retrieving and displaying advertisements with the app.
However, these more recent tests on mobile websites blamed poor coding choices for the higher-than-neccessary consumption.
"Despite the growing popularity of mobile web browsing, the energy consumed by a phone browser while surfing the web is poorly understood," the report said.
"We hope this paper demonstrates the importance of building a mobile site optimised for mobile devices.
"Sites who do not, end up draining the battery of visiting phones. This can potentially reduce traffic to the site."
The researchers revealed that by analysing and tweaking the design of Wikipedia, energy consumption could be reduced by 30% - without affecting the user experience.
The report added: "Our results show that for popular sites, downloading and parsing cascade style sheets and Javascript consumes a significant fraction of the total energy needed to render the page."
Power-hungry
Other tweaks suggested by the report include using the .jpeg image format instead of other file types like .gif and .png.
Apple.com came out worst in the test - but this is largely due to the site not having a version optimised for mobile use.
Google's email offering Gmail was declared the most efficient site in the findings, a fact credited to its use of HTML for key functions rather than the more power-hungry Javascript.
"Our experiments suggest that using links instead of Javascript greatly reduces the rendering energy for the page," the researchers said.
"Thus, by designing the mobile version of the site differently than its desktop version, Gmail was able to save energy on the phone."
The research is to be presented at the World Wide Web 2012 conference in Lyon this week.
www.chargezone.co.uk
www.youtube.com/chargezone
www.vimeo.com/chargezone
The Public Smartphone Charging Media with Brand Focused Advertising
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)